< Back to All News

Brent Douglas Cole Who Shot Federal, State Officers Charged With Federal Crimes

Submitted to KNCO: DOJ Eastern District of California

SACRAMENTO, Calif. October 2, 2014 – A federal grand jury returned a three-count indictment today against Brent Douglas Cole, 61, of Nevada County, charging him with assault on a federal officer with a deadly weapon which inflicted bodily injury, assault on a person assisting a federal officer with a deadly weapon which inflicted bodily injury, and discharge of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced.

According to court documents, on June 14, 2014, a BLM ranger stopped Cole after he observed Cole driving his truck on a closed dirt road on BLM land near the South Yuba River campground. The ranger warned Cole not to drive on the road again and allowed him to leave without issuing him a citation. The ranger continued up the dirt road and discovered a makeshift campsite with two motorcycles — one of which had been reported stolen, and one had expired tags. The ranger requested the CHP’s help to impound the motorcycles. While he and a CHP officer were preparing to move the two motorcycles, Cole arrived at the campsite armed, and an exchange of gunfire took place. Cole wounded the BLM ranger in the left shoulder and the CHP officer in the right, lower leg. Cole was struck several times by law enforcement. Cole, the BLM ranger, and the CHP officer received medical attention, and all will survive their wounds.

This case is the product of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of Land Management, the Nevada County Sheriff’s Office, the Nevada County District Attorney’s Office, and the California Highway Patrol. Assistant United States Attorneys Michael D. McCoy and Heiko Coppola are prosecuting the case.

If convicted of all counts, Cole faces a possible maximum statutory penalty of 50 years in prison and a $750,000 fine. Any sentence, however, would be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables. The charges are only allegations; the defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

1 Comment

October 7, 2014

Dana King

Interesting. So if guilty the guy gets 50 years. Why then, when a SWAT team kicks in the wrong door at the wrong address, a heinous constitutional violation, throws a grenade into a crib and blows the face off a little baby, shoots their dog and puts two bullets into the homeowner holding a golf club, do the cops not get thrown in jail for 50 years and fined $750k?

WHY are the consequences against citizens so much greater for criminal acts than for those charged to enforce them who commit even more violent criminal acts?

KNCO Web Comments Guidelines

  1. Keep it clean. Comments with inappropriate language, no matter how cleverly spelled or decorated will not be posted.
  2. Comments on the way the story was written or misspelled words will be passed on to the story authors and not posted.
  3. Please use your real name. Anonymous comments or comments posted using a fake name or web handle may not be posted.
  4. Please use your real email address so we can contact you.
  5. No flaming. Any comments that are primarily of a name calling finger pointing nature may not be posted.
  6. The comment section is not a right it is a privilege. KNCO retains all rights as to what is posted on its website.

Leave A Comment



* captcha